Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02

>>>>> "wayne" == wayne  <wayne at schlitt.net> writes:

    wayne> Isn't the time to fix the problem now?  Before the
    wayne> experiment is run?

Can you convince the sender ID authors to do so and to change their
implementations?

I don't think the IETF or IESG could accomplish that.  If you can then
I agree we will have a better Internet.

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.