Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02

["william(at)elan.net" <william at elan.net>]

On Fri, 9 Dec 2005, Sam Hartman wrote:

> > > > > > "wayne" == wayne  <wayne at schlitt.net> writes:
>
>    wayne> Isn't the time to fix the problem now?  Before the
>    wayne> experiment is run?
>
> Can you convince the sender ID authors to do so and to change their
> implementations?
>
> I don't think the IETF or IESG could accomplish that.  If you can then
> I agree we will have a better Internet.

You might not be able to accomplish that, but you need not support its
publication as RFC either. Tell them clearly that if they want their
docs published as RFC, the experiment needs to be defined so that it
does not cause interoperability problems with other experiments and
does not violate existing standards.

--
William Leibzon
Elan Networks
william at elan.net

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf