Re declare SPF and Sender-ID to be Informational
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re declare SPF and Sender-ID to be Informational



> I cannot find any evidence from RFC 2026 that there is any such
> thing as an "IETF experiment" or "IETF-sanctioned experiment".

Me neither.  Since neither the SPF nor the Sender-ID crowds appear to
have any interest in modifying their specs, that doesn't sound like an
experiment to me, IETF or otherwise.

I'd suggest the most sensible thing to do is to reclassify both of them
as Informational, to document what you might find in some TXT records,
publish them, and be done with it.

Regards,
John Levine, johnl at iecc.com, IRTF ASRG chair

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf




Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.