![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
> I cannot find any evidence from RFC 2026 that there is any such > thing as an "IETF experiment" or "IETF-sanctioned experiment". Me neither. Since neither the SPF nor the Sender-ID crowds appear to have any interest in modifying their specs, that doesn't sound like an experiment to me, IETF or otherwise. I'd suggest the most sensible thing to do is to reclassify both of them as Informational, to document what you might find in some TXT records, publish them, and be done with it. Regards, John Levine, johnl at iecc.com, IRTF ASRG chair _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf at ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.