![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
and now the chairs quickly concede the change, even before getting support from the rest of the group.
'scuse me; it seemed to me that Tony Hansen and Jim Fenton counted as some of the rest of the group. It also seems to me that no one has made me the boss, so what I suggested was just that: a suggestion. You may feel free to spend more time arguing about that paragraph if you like. My opinion (and that's all it is) is that that's not useful.
I understand the principle you're fighting for, Dave. And I think it will come up again, which is why you're fighting it. I think it will be better to fight it later, if necessary.
Barry
-- Barry Leiba, Pervasive Computing Technology (leiba at watson.ibm.com) http://www.research.ibm.com/people/l/leiba http://www.research.ibm.com/spam
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf at ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.