Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim)



Michael,

Nice note.

One point, however:

Michael Thomas wrote:
 We have already agreed to -- and incorporated -- a
substantial backward incompatible change (the canonicalization)
due to feedback (and threats) we got. What I'm hoping for

We have agreed to the addition of an enhancement that provides a good alternative to the existing set of two algorithms.


That is quite different from tossing out over-the-wire backward compatibility.

I have not seen the group agree that a sender of an (ESTG) DKIMv1 signature will fail with an (IETF) DKIMv2 validator.

d/
--

 Dave Crocker
 Brandenburg InternetWorking
 +1.408.246.8253
 dcrocker  a t ...
 WE'VE MOVED to:  www.bbiw.net

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf




Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.