Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim)

[Dave Crocker <dhc2 at dcrocker.net>]

>     I
> think it has also been claimed that it is sufficiently finished
> and mature that IETF ratification and endorsement is needed, but
> no real changes are required or desirable.  

John,

1. That is not what has been claimed or sought for DKIM.  Ever.  There 
is a world of difference between protecting existing implementations and 
seeking "no real changes".

2. This misrepresentation of things has been asserted repeatedly and has 
been correctly repeatedly.

3. At this stage, repeating this misrepresentation has taken on the 
characteristic of willful distortion.

d/
--

 Dave Crocker
 Brandenburg InternetWorking
 +1.408.246.8253
 dcrocker  a t ...
 WE'VE MOVED to:  www.bbiw.net

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf