Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim)

["william(at)elan.net" <william at elan.net>]

On Fri, 23 Dec 2005, Stephen Farrell wrote:

> Hi Eric,
>
> Eric Rescorla wrote:
> > > The not-DKIM proponents want something better, for some value of
> > > "better".
> >
> > More accurately, we want the charter not to foreclose the option
> > of doing something better, on the grounds that it's incompatible.
>
> I hope Tony's proposal to use the xmpp text instead resloves the
> charter issue for you.
>
> I think if we have a consensus on that text amongst both proponents
> and not-proponents then we can and should move on. (Which for this
> list means considering Jim's latest threats draft I guess.)

Stephen,

The issue with limitations due to text that says that authorization
keys will be placed and retrieved from dns is still open.

---
William Leibzon
Elan Networks
william at elan.net

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf