Re: bozoproofing the net, was The Value of Reputation
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: bozoproofing the net, was The Value of Reputation





--On søndag, januar 01, 2006 22:53:15 -0500 John R Levine <johnl at iecc.com> wrote:

Or consider S/MIME.  S/MIME applications have a cert list similar to the
one in a web browser, so they also have the problem of dividing the world
into haves who can afford a cert with a signature from someone in the list
and have-nots who can't.  I haven't read every word of every S/MIME RFC
(there sure are a lot of them), but if there's any warnings about
balkanization, they're very well hidden.

I think you are making John's point.......

There's a pair of facts (or what passes for facts) here:

- the IETF community has rejected the idea of mandating a single root for "just about anything" (except for the DNS, the IANA and the address spaces)
- Multiple roots lead to balkanization (of lesser or greater severity)


If these statements are both true, they might explain the lack of success of S/MIME as a tool for general (rather than balkanized) communication.

As far as I remember, neither of these statements have come out as consensus statements in any IETF document - perhaps because "everyone" knows that raising the issue will cause an endless debate and no consensus document?

Might be time to challenge that assumption....

                      Harald


_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf at ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf




Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.