Re: bozoproofing the net, was The Value of Reputation
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bozoproofing the net, was The Value of Reputation
--On søndag, januar 01, 2006 22:53:15 -0500 John R Levine <johnl at iecc.com>
wrote:
Or consider S/MIME. S/MIME applications have a cert list similar to the
one in a web browser, so they also have the problem of dividing the world
into haves who can afford a cert with a signature from someone in the list
and have-nots who can't. I haven't read every word of every S/MIME RFC
(there sure are a lot of them), but if there's any warnings about
balkanization, they're very well hidden.
I think you are making John's point.......
There's a pair of facts (or what passes for facts) here:
- the IETF community has rejected the idea of mandating a single root for
"just about anything" (except for the DNS, the IANA and the address spaces)
- Multiple roots lead to balkanization (of lesser or greater severity)
If these statements are both true, they might explain the lack of success
of S/MIME as a tool for general (rather than balkanized) communication.
As far as I remember, neither of these statements have come out as
consensus statements in any IETF document - perhaps because "everyone"
knows that raising the issue will cause an endless debate and no consensus
document?
Might be time to challenge that assumption....
Harald
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions
of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.
Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.