Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim)

To: ietf at ietf.org
Subject: Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim)
From: John Levine <johnl at iecc.com>
Date: 3 Jan 2006 04:55:32 -0000
In-reply-to: <7.0.0.16.2.20060102113007.05eee498@vigilsec.com>
List-help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Organization: I.E.C.C., Trumansburg NY USA
Sender: ietf-bounces at ietf.org

>Here is the revised proposed charter text:

Thanks for pulling this together.

If I had unlimited time to waste, I might niggle about a word or two,
but it's fine as is, and I look forward to moving ahead and getting
some work done.

R's,
John


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

Follow-Ups:
- Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim)
  - From: Ned Freed
- Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim)
  - From: Tony Hansen

References:
- Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim)
  - From: Russ Housley

Prev by Date: RE: Alternative formats for IDs
Next by Date: RE: Alternative formats for IDs
Previous by thread: Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim)
Next by thread: Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim)

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.