Re: The Value of Reputation

To: John Leslie <john at jlc.net>
Subject: Re: The Value of Reputation
From: Jim Fenton <fenton at cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2006 14:40:28 -0800
Cc: IETF at ietf.org
In-reply-to: <20060103222546.GA85080@verdi>
List-help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <43A8C2EC.4060401@dcrocker.net> <B69E2466D9070E5D27F23698@scan.jck.com> <Pine.LNX.4.62.0512210509190.23251@sokol.elan.net> <D0D38CAF74341DE0D597AEAD@svartdal.hjemme.alvestrand.no> <Pine.LNX.4.62.0512210901030.23251@sokol.elan.net> <0b0d55f43c319b517cad80dd1d5d76d0@guppylake.com> <1135458563.17219.79.camel@bash.adsl-64-142-13-68> <e94764f4db0096fee65ff6a2d27a753b@guppylake.com> <20051231043648.GA17422@verdi> <43BAF0A6.2090601@cisco.com> <20060103222546.GA85080@verdi>
Sender: ietf-bounces at ietf.org
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Windows/20050716)

John Leslie wrote:

>   The question of standards for reputation and accreditation, IMHO,
>deserves IETF work and could deliver great value. But to be clear, I
>do not think it belongs in DKIM.
>
>  
>
I strongly agree.  By CCing the ietf-dkim list on my message I didn't
mean to imply that the work belongs there.

-Jim

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

References:
- Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim)
  - From: Dave Crocker
- Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim)
  - From: John C Klensin
- Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim)
  - From: william(at)elan.net
- Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim)
  - From: Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim)
  - From: william(at)elan.net
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim)
  - From: Nathaniel Borenstein
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim)
  - From: Douglas Otis
- The Value of Reputation (was Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim))
  - From: Nathaniel Borenstein
- Re: The Value of Reputation (was Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim))
  - From: John Leslie
- Re: The Value of Reputation
  - From: Jim Fenton
- Re: The Value of Reputation
  - From: John Leslie

Prev by Date: Re: The Value of Reputation
Next by Date: Re: Troubles with UTF-8
Previous by thread: Re: The Value of Reputation
Next by thread: Re: The Value of Reputation (was Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim))
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: The Value of Reputation

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.