RE: Alternative formats for IDs

To: "Gray, Eric" <Eric.Gray at marconi.com>
Subject: RE: Alternative formats for IDs
From: "Yaakov Stein" <yaakov_s at rad.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2006 08:15:01 +0200
Cc: ietf at ietf.org
List-help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: ietf-bounces at ietf.org
Thread-index: AcYQolL+YGxZU54lTrCU3U2ZhM0h4QAU7Krg
Thread-topic: Alternative formats for IDs

 

> Clarifying that "publicly known" means "well defined and publicly
available", I would answer no...

and if it is restricted to mean 
  "open description so that you could write your own editor to read and
write this format" ?



_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Alternative formats for IDs
  - From: Julian Reschke

Prev by Date: Re: Troubles with UTF-8
Next by Date: Re: Troubles with UTF-8
Previous by thread: RE: Alternative formats for IDs
Next by thread: Re: Alternative formats for IDs
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

RE: Alternative formats for IDs

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.