Re: bozoproofing the net, was The Value of Reputation
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bozoproofing the net, was The Value of Reputation
Harald Tveit Alvestrand wrote:
[]
Sigh. Can I suggest that a little exponential backoff on
all parts may be appropriate? As one of the authors of the
dkim draft, this has been an extremely painful thread to
watch.
Mike
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
- References:
- Re: bozoproofing the net, was The Value of Reputation
- Re: bozoproofing the net, was The Value of Reputation
- Re: bozoproofing the net, was The Value of Reputation
- Re: bozoproofing the net, was The Value of Reputation
- Re: bozoproofing the net, was The Value of Reputation
- Re: bozoproofing the net, was The Value of Reputation
- From: Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: bozoproofing the net, was The Value of Reputation
- Re: bozoproofing the net, was The Value of Reputation
- From: Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: bozoproofing the net, was The Value of Reputation
- Re: bozoproofing the net, was The Value of Reputation
- From: Harald Tveit Alvestrand
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions
of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.
Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.