![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
--On mandag, januar 02, 2006 18:10:15 +0200 Yaakov Stein <yaakov_s at rad.com> wrote:
The only thing I am sure about is that consensus on this list is for keeping everything exactly as it is.
I'm pretty sure there's no such consensus.
I do, however, see a rather strong consensus-of-the-speakers against using MS-Word document format for anything "official".
I think we need to tackle this whole issue, if we do decide to tackle it, in a much more systematic way.
- what are our functional requirements? - which of them are not met today? - what are the possible solutions, and what is their practical and operational cost? - which, if any, solutions should we adopt, on what timescale?
I believe that if we took a systematic approach like that, the issue of how we determine consensus would be broken into enough small steps that it really wouldn't be an issue.
Brian
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf at ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.