![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Harald Tveit Alvestrand wrote: []
Sigh. Can I suggest that a little exponential backoff on all parts may be appropriate? As one of the authors of the dkim draft, this has been an extremely painful thread to watch.
Correct. This is way beyond the point of being productive and beyond the point where busy people will even read 5% of the messages.
Brian
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf at ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.