Re: objection to proposed change to "consensus"

[Ken Raeburn <raeburn at MIT.EDU>]

On Jan 6, 2006, at 09:02, Sandy Wills wrote:
>    This is not a change; this seems to be the way the IETF works.   
> Many group gatherings work the same way; to me its an intuitive way  
> of getting any/all objections brought up, or establishing that  
> there aren't any, after a period of free discussion.

If it's not a change, then there's no need for text suggesting how  
the IESG should judge consensus in this matter, is there?

Ken

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf