Re: Alternative formats for IDs

To: braden at ISI.EDU, ietf at ietf.org
Subject: Re: Alternative formats for IDs
From: Bob Braden <braden at ISI.EDU>
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 15:26:16 -0800 (PST)
Cc:
List-help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: ietf-bounces at ietf.org

Who is volunteering to maintain xml2rfc and guarantee backwards
compatibility for the next 20 years?  (And why should
we believe them?)

Bob Braden

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

Prev by Date: RE: PDF, Postscript, and "normative" versions (was: Re: Baby Steps (was RE: Alternative formats for IDs))
Next by Date: Re: Alternative formats for IDs
Previous by thread: Re: Alternative formats for IDs
Next by thread: Re: Alternative formats for IDs
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: Alternative formats for IDs

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.