Re: Alternative formats for IDs

To: ned.freed at mrochek.com, dcrocker at bbiw.net
Subject: Re: Alternative formats for IDs
From: Bob Braden <braden at ISI.EDU>
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 15:36:26 -0800 (PST)
Cc: braden at ISI.EDU, ietf at ietf.org, paul.hoffman at vpnc.org
List-help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: ietf-bounces at ietf.org

  *> 
  *> 2. Given that the RFC Editor has the current practice of converting .txt 
  *> submissions to nroff, it is equally reasonable to pursue their changing that 
  *> conversion, to instead be into xml2rfc.

Dave,

Are you suggesting that the IETF adopt the xml2rfc source as the
normative version of a specification, rather than the .txt (or .pdf)
version?

Bob Braden

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Alternative formats for IDs
  - From: Dave Crocker

Prev by Date: Re: Alternative formats for IDs
Next by Date: Re: Alternative formats for IDs
Previous by thread: Re: Alternative formats for IDs
Next by thread: Re: Alternative formats for IDs
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: Alternative formats for IDs

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.