Re: Alternative formats for IDs

[Keith Moore <moore at cs.utk.edu>]

> >It seems like the more efficient approach would be to essentially have two 
> >stages, where the authors first sign off on the result of copy-editing, and 
> >then on whatever cosmetic changes are needed after the final conversion.
> >
> That assumes that the xml->nroff conversion is always error-free.  I 
> think that that's an overassumption.

I've seen several cases where "cosmetic changes" introduced technical errors
in a document.

Keith

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf