![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Maybe we're attacking that part of it the wrong way. What is it that makes those "cosmetic" changes, to "get the format just right", so important? Do we really care whether there's an extra blank line, or the indentation is one character too much?
RFCs are input to human readers, not machines.
Bob Braden
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf at ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.