Re: Alternative formats for IDs

["Spencer Dawkins" <spencer at mcsr-labs.org>]

(clipped down to)


> > > Maybe we're attacking that part of it the wrong way.
> > > What is it that makes those "cosmetic" changes, to "get the format
> > > just right", so important?  Do we really care whether there's an
> > > extra blank line, or the indentation is one character too much?
> >
> > Well, yes, we do.  At least, the RFC Editor cares, and we believe
> > you should care too.  Blank lines are not just randomly inserted...
> > they are put in to enhance readability
>
> When you say that you make cosmetic changes beyond what's been done
> with xml2rfc, and agreed to by those who've reviewed it, I presume
> you're making stylistic changes that the RFC editor cares about that
> "we" didn't (if we did, we'd have already made those changes).  I'm
> wonder what sorts of things those are, and whether they're really worth
> all the extra overhead.

... and whether it would be good if the working group had been reviewing a 
more-readable version of the document, and had forwarded a more-readable 
version for last call and IESG review...

Given that the RFC Editor has published more documents than I've written in 
my life, I don't question what's being done. I'm just asking if it might be 
done automatically, and be done earlier in the process.

I'm guessing these are changes that the RFC Editor has been feeding to the 
XML2RFC authors via Bill Fenner in 
http://rtg.ietf.org/Members/BillFenner/rfced-xml/FrontPage/issuetracker, and 
that we're moving closer to "fire and forget" XML2RFC operation, so maybe 
all is well, or at least improving?

Spencer 



_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf