![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Joe Touch wrote:
Elwyn Davies wrote:you can't do it from inside Word and in my experience the Word process broke about 80% of the time (mostly due to the generic text printer being horribly buggy) but maybe it is better now since I gave up with Word some time ago. [Microsoft were never interested in fixing these bugs - reducing some lines to heights of a fraction of a point and rendering one character per line in an apparently random fashion - and they persisted across multiple releases of Word.]
I used to use the Word template but the freedom from hassle of
generating the final documents
I'm not sure what freedom this means; XML still needs to run through a
script, just as Word does.
I am sure I could buy some tools but how well integrated with Word would this be and how much would it cost me?
the ease of generating references
Commercial software allows BIBTEX references to be imported into citation databases, so this is moot as well.
makes
xxe/xml2rfc
and support of complex numbered lists (almost impossible to achieve in
Word)
I checked your three current I-Ds and five RFCs, and the most complex
numbering I saw was "G1, G2, ...", "P1, P2...", and paragraphs numbered
"G.1:, G.2:...". Word has been able to handle all of these since the
late 1980's. Was there a more complex example I missed, or one in a
pending document that hasn't been issued that you could give as an example?
Don't let me stop you using Word but I know which set of tools I prefer.
Elwyn
Joe
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf at ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.