Re: Last Call: 'Location Types Registry' to Proposed Standard

[Joe Abley <jabley at isc.org>]

On 17-Jan-2006, at 08:00, Frank Ellermann wrote:

> The IESG wrote:
>
> > consider the following document:
> > - 'Location Types Registry '
> >    <draft-ietf-geopriv-location-types-registry-03.txt>
> > as a Proposed Standard
>
> I'm lost with the purpose of this document.

It seems from a quick glance through it that draft-ietf-simple- 
rpid-08 gives context.

The initial list of locations seems entirely arbitrary, and most of  
the definitions seem woolly and imprecise. Maybe the arbitrariness is  
intentional, though, and maybe the quality of definitions doesn't  
matter. I don't know enough about the goals of the underlying effort  
to comment.

There are some spelling mistakes. That's about as far as my informed  
commentary on this draft goes :-)


Joe

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf