Re: Re: how to declare consensus when someone ignores consensus

[John Loughney <john.loughney at kolumbus.fi>]

> On 01/22/2006 22:27 PM, John Loughney allegedly wrote:
> > Look at various peer-to-peer protocols as a good
> > examples of things that people use everyday, but wouldn't stand a
> > chance of getting an RFC.
> 
> Why not?

Now we're close to side veering off into process issues, but rather than going into that rat-hole, I'll just pose a question: do you think p2p protocol authors would have any motiviation to create a Security Considerations section that would pass IESG review?

John


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf