Re: how to declare consensus when someone ignores consensus

[Dave Crocker <dhc2 at dcrocker.net>]

> Now we're close to side veering off into process issues, but rather than 
> going into that rat-hole, I'll just pose a question: do you think p2p 
> protocol authors would have any motiviation to create a Security
> Considerations section that would pass IESG review?


a security considerations section would be a breeze, compared to the 
pre-chartering hoops we regularly impose on new areas of work, especially any 
with a real security component, independent of prior work.

d/



--

Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
<http://bbiw.net>

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf