Re: how to declare consensus when someone ignores consensus

["Anthony G. Atkielski" <anthony at atkielski.com>]

John Loughney writes:

> Now we're close to side veering off into process issues, but
> rather than going into that rat-hole, I'll just pose a question: do
> you think p2p protocol authors would have any motiviation to create
> a Security Considerations section that would pass IESG review?

Do you think that protocol authors would have any good reason to
submit anything for anyone's review, when the same time could be spent
writing software products?


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf