RE: IETF Last Call under RFC 3683 concerning JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: IETF Last Call under RFC 3683 concerning JFC (Jefsey) Morfin



Eliot,

	Plenty of time to ask why, once it becomes clear what the
prevalent opinion is.

	I personally find the question a bit on the obnoxious side
prior to that.  When seeking consensus, it is usually necessary 
only to determine what the issues are in the minority opinion,
and largely "nosy-ness" and distraction to ask the basis of the 
opinion among majority opinion holders.

	Consequently, people should first determine what direction
the group is leaning before hosing the discussion with a bunch
of questions about the why's and wherefore's of opinions.

--
Eric

--> -----Original Message-----
--> From: ietf-bounces at ietf.org [mailto:ietf-bounces at ietf.org] 
--> On Behalf Of Eliot Lear
--> Sent: Sunday, January 22, 2006 7:25 AM
--> To: Marshall Eubanks
--> Cc: Scott Hollenbeck; ietf at ietf.org; 
--> ietf-announce at ietf.org; iesg at ietf.org
--> Subject: Re: IETF Last Call under RFC 3683 concerning JFC 
--> (Jefsey) Morfin
--> 
--> Marshall,
--> > I do not support approval of this PR-action.
--> 
--> Because.....??
--> 
--> 
--> _______________________________________________
--> Ietf mailing list
--> Ietf at ietf.org
--> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
--> 

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf




Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.