Re: IETFs... the final Friday?

[Jeffrey Hutzelman <jhutz at cmu.edu>]

On Monday, January 23, 2006 02:26:31 PM -0800 Eric Rescorla 
<ekr at networkresonance.com> wrote:

> Ken Raeburn <raeburn at MIT.EDU> writes:
>
> > On Jan 23, 2006, at 17:07, Allison Mankin wrote:
> > > 2.
> > > Some of us wondered if Friday would be more attractive if the net
> > > didn't come down at noon, so that if you commit to staying for the WG
> > > meeting on Friday morning, and you have a late flight, or fly out the
> > > next morning, you can get some work or email done during the rest of
> > > the day.
> > >
> > > Anyone else find resonance with that?
> >
> > Definitely.  Tearing it down at noon definitely gives the feeling of
> > "you're done, you should be gone now".
>
> Totally agree.

As do I.  Of course, agreeing that the net should stay up the rest of 
Friday is the easy part.  The hard part is getting the volunteers who do 
the work to commit to staying around that long...

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf