![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Ken Raeburn wrote: ...
Finally, I noticed the IAD included a question about Friday meeting or not in the survey we were invited to on 9 January. Getting a sense of peoples' views quantitatively is good, though that was a self-selected group, rather than a random sample that could be assigned a statistical mapping to the IETF population.
How about a questionnaire at the next IETF or two? (With collection going through Friday noon at least, of course.) Still somewhat self- selected, but it's reaching out specifically to those who attend regularly.
I think we'll stick to an on-line survey; having people do their own data entry and having a computer add up the numbers saves a lot of clerical expense. We can discriminate in the survey between attendees and non-attendees. As for the self-selection bias that Allison notes, I'm afraid that is very hard to avoid without much more work.
Brian
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf at ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.