Re: "too many notes" -- a modest proposal

[Andy Bierman <ietf at andybierman.com>]

Anthony G. Atkielski wrote:

> Andy Bierman writes:
>
>  
>
> > I do not share your regulatory zeal.
> > As a WG Chair and WG participant, I have enough rules to follow already.
> > The last thing I want to do is count messages and bytes, and enforce
> > draconian rules like this.
> >    
>
> But counting messages and bytes happens to be something that can be
> easily automated, and it can be applied with absolute consistency to
> everyone, without prejudice.  Of course, those are exactly the reasons
> why many people would reject the idea--they want to keep other people
> from posting, but they also fear being prevented from posting
> themselves.
>  

I think you missed my point.
I should have said "enforce or abide by draconian rules".
Automating the process is even worse.
Then stupid scripts disrupt WG activity on a regular basis.
Inappropriate mailing list use should be dealt with by the
WG Chair(s) in a more diplomatic manner. 


Andy

> _______________________________________________
> Ietf mailing list
> Ietf at ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
>
>
>  


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf