Re: Proposal for keeping "free speech" but limitting the nuisance to the working group (Was: John Cowan supports 3683 PR-action against Jefsey Morfin)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Proposal for keeping "free speech" but limitting the nuisance to the working group (Was: John Cowan supports 3683 PR-action against Jefsey Morfin)



Brian E Carpenter wrote:
 
> A practice I used when I was diffserv chair and we had quite a lot
> of off-topic postings was to create a second list, diffserv-interest
> (which still exists BTW). The rule for diffserv at ietf.org was "must
> be relevant to a chartered work item" and the rule for diffserv-interest
> was "must be relevant to diffserv technology."

Though I never participated in diffserv WG activities, which was
chartered wrongly from the beginning, your chairing strategy
explains why the result of the WG is technically meaningless.

> People only interested
> in the standards work simply ignored the -interest list.

They ignored the -interest list and the technology.

							Masataka Ohta



_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf




Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.