![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Brian E Carpenter wrote: > A practice I used when I was diffserv chair and we had quite a lot > of off-topic postings was to create a second list, diffserv-interest > (which still exists BTW). The rule for diffserv at ietf.org was "must > be relevant to a chartered work item" and the rule for diffserv-interest > was "must be relevant to diffserv technology." Though I never participated in diffserv WG activities, which was chartered wrongly from the beginning, your chairing strategy explains why the result of the WG is technically meaningless. > People only interested > in the standards work simply ignored the -interest list. They ignored the -interest list and the technology. Masataka Ohta _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf at ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.