Re: Last Call: 'TLS User Mapping Extension' to Proposed Standard

["Steven M. Bellovin" <smb at cs.columbia.edu>]

In message <20060219013238.779CC22241D at laser.networkresonance.com>, Eric Rescor
la writes:

>
>Since the IETF would not have change control, this is an inappropriate
>work item for the TLS WG and therefore the authors appear to have
>decided on an Individual Submission. The reason for the intended status
>of Proposed Standard 

Do we have a process issue here?  Can we have a Proposed Standard
without the IETF having change control?  (2026 speaks of change control 
only in the context of a WG.)

		--Steven M. Bellovin, http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb



_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf