Re: IESG Statement on disruptive posting

To: ietf at ietf.org
Subject: Re: IESG Statement on disruptive posting
From: Brian E Carpenter <brc at zurich.ibm.com>
Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2006 09:01:58 +0100
In-reply-to: <6.2.3.4.2.20060218032046.05e6a8b0@pop.online.fr>
List-help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Organization: IBM
References: <6.2.3.4.2.20060218024811.0600eeb0@pop.online.fr> <tsl1wy1mmsk.fsf@cz.mit.edu> <6.2.3.4.2.20060218032046.05e6a8b0@pop.online.fr>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113

Somebody said:

... You cannot fight disruption without formality.


An IESG statement issued under the authority granted to the
IESG by RFC 2026 is formal.

   Brian Carpenter
   IETF Chair


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

References:
- Re: IESG Statement on disruptive posting
  - From: Sam Hartman
- Re: IESG Statement on disruptive posting
  - From: Jefsey Morfin

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.