Re: Last Call: 'TLS User Mapping Extension' to Proposed Standard

[Russ Housley <housley at vigilsec.com>]

Steve & Eric:

The document that is in Last Call gives the IETF complete change 
control.  There is no process issue.

Russ

At 10:32 PM 2/18/2006, Steven M. Bellovin wrote:
> In message <20060219013238.779CC22241D at laser.networkresonance.com>, 
> Eric Rescor
> la writes:
>
> >
> >Since the IETF would not have change control, this is an inappropriate
> >work item for the TLS WG and therefore the authors appear to have
> >decided on an Individual Submission. The reason for the intended status
> >of Proposed Standard
>
> Do we have a process issue here?  Can we have a Proposed Standard
> without the IETF having change control?  (2026 speaks of change control
> only in the context of a WG.)
>
>                 --Steven M. Bellovin, http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf