Re: IESG Statement on disruptive posting
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: IESG Statement on disruptive posting
At 03:19 18/02/2006, Sam Hartman wrote:
I think we disagree significantly on the level of formality needed here.
yes. But I know future will turn me right unfortunately. You cannot
fight disruption without formality. This is precisely what the IAB
said. Do you treat computer security informally?
Here you treat billions people's security, through stability of the
IETF. Just remember I am the hacker, and I thnk I know how breakers
would do. And who some can be. Don't take risks.
jfc
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions
of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.
Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.