Re: IESG Statement on disruptive posting
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: IESG Statement on disruptive posting



At 03:19 18/02/2006, Sam Hartman wrote:
I think we disagree significantly on the level of formality needed here.

yes. But I know future will turn me right unfortunately. You cannot fight disruption without formality. This is precisely what the IAB said. Do you treat computer security informally?


Here you treat billions people's security, through stability of the IETF. Just remember I am the hacker, and I thnk I know how breakers would do. And who some can be. Don't take risks.
jfc



_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf at ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.