Re: Last Call: 'Definitions of Managed Objects for Remote Ping, Traceroute, and Lookup Operations' to Proposed Standard

[Frank Ellermann <nobody at xyzzy.claranet.de>]

Sam Hartman wrote:
 
> When you combine increase with monotonically you rule out the
> possibility that it is equal.

Depending on the definition as discussed here.  I'd have no
problem if somebody claims that trunc(x) or timestamp2date(t)
are "monotically increasing".  

> I'd expect for an index you want increasing by one, which is
> more strict than monotonically increasing.

Maybe the author allows to skip some hops (indices) - I didn't
look into the draft.  Simply saying "strictly" with or without
"monotically" might be better.
                                Bye, Frank



_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf