RE: [TLS] Re: Last Call: 'TLS User Mapping Extension' to Proposed Standard

["Stefan Santesson" <stefans at microsoft.com>]

Just to clarify this point.

The text in the introduction where the authors retained change control
was a leftover from the original draft that was intended to go
informational.

We simply forgot to remove this when we changed the scope to
informational.
This is fixed in version 03 of the draft.


Stefan Santesson
Program Manager, Standards Liaison
Windows Security


-----Original Message-----
From: Russ Housley [mailto:housley at vigilsec.com] 
Sent: den 19 februari 2006 23:22
To: Bill Fenner; Steven M. Bellovin
Cc: iesg at ietf.org; tls at ietf.org; ietf at ietf.org
Subject: [TLS] Re: Last Call: 'TLS User Mapping Extension' to Proposed
Standard

I misunderstood the original question.  I'll get it fixed or withdraw 
the Last Call.

Russ


At 12:38 AM 2/19/2006, Bill Fenner wrote:

> >Can we have a Proposed Standard
> >without the IETF having change control?
>
>No.  RFC3978 says, in section 5.2 where it describes the derivative
>works limitation that's present in draft-santesson-tls-ume, "These
>notices may not be used with any standards-track document".
>
>   Bill


_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list
TLS at lists.ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf