RE: Last Call: 'TLS User Mapping Extension' to Proposed Standard

["Stefan Santesson" <stefans at microsoft.com>]

This empty appendix was removed in draft 02.

As Russ stated before, an IPR disclosure has been posted to the IETF IPR
page which can be found at:


Stefan Santesson
Program Manager, Standards Liaison
Windows Security


-----Original Message-----
From: Bill Strahm [mailto:bill at strahm.net] 
Sent: den 20 februari 2006 02:21
To: Russ Housley
Cc: Bill Fenner; tls at ietf.org; ietf at ietf.org; iesg at ietf.org; Steven M.
Bellovin
Subject: Re: Last Call: 'TLS User Mapping Extension' to Proposed
Standard

I saw all of the huff, and while I agree with it, I am more concerned
about

Appendix A. IPR Disclosure

    TBD

What does that mean, and more specifically is a document with a TBD 
section really ready for last call at all ?

Bill
Russ Housley wrote:
> I misunderstood the original question.  I'll get it fixed or withdraw 
> the Last Call.
> 
> Russ
> 
> 
> At 12:38 AM 2/19/2006, Bill Fenner wrote:
> 
>> >Can we have a Proposed Standard
>> >without the IETF having change control?
>>
>> No.  RFC3978 says, in section 5.2 where it describes the derivative
>> works limitation that's present in draft-santesson-tls-ume, "These
>> notices may not be used with any standards-track document".
>>
>>   Bill
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf mailing list
> Ietf at ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
> 
> 


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf