Re: Gen-art review of draft-hartman-mailinglist-experiment-01.txt

[Elwyn Davies <elwynd at dial.pipex.com>]

Hi.


Sam Hartman wrote:
> I am happy to make a change similar to the one you propose in section
> 1.
>
> I'm happy to split the parts of section 4 dealing with what the IESG
> might do into their own section as an example.
>   
That's fine by me.. it should make a self-consistent document.
> I do not want to remove them completely.
>
> Would that be OK
>   

As regards gen-art I think it would be fine.

Ultimately I am only a small part of the consensus as regards the 
experiment proposed.
Personally, I would prefer that we didn't have to waste inordinate 
amounts of time on mailing list management.  Unfortunately knocking 
virtual heads together isn't very effective.

/Elwyn

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf