Re: FYI -- IAB statement on IANA RFI

[Brian E Carpenter <brc at zurich.ibm.com>]

It's been pointed out that the note to DoC was actually sent by
the IAB and the IETF *Chair* not the IETF as whole.

Obviously, the timescale of this RFI was too short for the
IETF as a whole to debate a response. In fact, it was even too short
for us to spot this nit.

    Brian

Leslie Daigle wrote:
> As you may have seen, the Department of Commerce has recently
> published a Request for Interest (RFI), for the whole IANA function:
>
> http://www.fbo.gov/spg/DOC/OS/OAM/Reference%2DNumber%2DDOCNTIARFI0001/SynopsisR.html 
>
>
> While the RFI was not a surprise, the IETF was not consulted in any way
> about the technical parameter assignment portion of the IANA work.
> As noted in the message we just sent in reply to this RFI,  this gives
> us some concern in terms of potential impact for IETF work.
>
> http://www.iab.org/documents/correspondence/IANA-2006/IAB-RFI-Input.pdf
>
> The IAB will be working through this year with the IAOC to ensure the
> IETF continues to have a suitable technical parameter assignment
> function.
>
>
> Leslie,
> for the IAB.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf mailing list
> Ietf at ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf