![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Carl,
my impression as a bystander is that the IETF has decided that sole source contracts (where only one contractor is permitted to bid) are, in general, a Bad Idea.
The Secretariat contract had very special circumstances, which caused it to be sole sourced, but I interpreted the words from Leslie's timeline:
May 7 2006[IASA] Request for Vendor Expressions of Interest
to mean a public request, where more than one organization is welcome to show interest.
Continuity has value, but I think it is up to the IASA to determine how continuity is weighted against other factors.
Harald (who has only public knowledge at this point)
There isn't much secret knowledge... but as an IAOC member, I feel we've been told by the community to seek multiple proposals when possible and appropriate, and in any case to be as transparent as possible in the process.
Brian
--On torsdag, mars 16, 2006 18:16:22 -0800 Carl Malamud <carl at media.org> wrote:
Carl -- did you get the other message (the one with the timeline)?
Yes, I did. Not having been party to the discussions, I'm not quite sure what is going on. We did a sole source re-assignment of the IETF secretariat. As I said in my note, I'm curious about:
1. the opinion from the RFC-Editor about this, in particular the charter. 2. what the IAB/IAOC is thinking ... this could be a sole source reassignment or a simple renewal.
I appreciate that a lot of thought obviously went into preparing your two notes, I'd just like to hear some of the background.
Best regards,
Carl
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf at ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf at ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf at ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.