Re: STRAW PROPOSAL RFC Editor charter
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: STRAW PROPOSAL RFC Editor charter




On 16 Mar 2006, at 18:06, Leslie Daigle wrote:
Following the note just sent about the proposed timeline for
reviewing the RFC Editor contract this year, here is the
STRAW proposal RFC Editor charter proposed by the IAB.

It is a modest extension of the RFC Editor paragraph as found
in RFC 2850 (the IAB Charter).

The purpose of this straw proposal is to inform discussions
scheduled for the GENAREA meeting at IETF65 in Dallas.
After the Dallas meeting, the IAB will provide a more formal
charter proposal.

STRAW RFC Editor Charter

The RFC Editor executes editorial management for the publication of ETF-sponsored
documents.  I am concerned that this is not being acknowledged now.
I would feel a lot better if there were more public acknowledgement
that the RFC Editor's role extends far beyond the IETF-sponsored
documents.

2. We have a specific segment on the independent submissions
channel in the General Area open meeting in Dallas. I'm a defender
of the existence of that channel, but that doesn't mean it
is something that exists without being chartered, funded and
accountable in some way.

Unfortunately, the IETF meetings do not currently have much participation from non-IETF people who are involved in the Internet community. So that approach puts one segment of the community in the position of deciding what is best for another segment of the Internet community.

	It would be better if that open meeting were supplemented
by IAB outreach -- and an IAB-sponsored (not IESG-sponsored)
open call for input via email -- to the broader set of folks
in the Internet community who aren't currently very involved
in IETF meetings.

	The IAB (or possibly ISoc BoT, but more obviously IAB and
not the IESG) ought to be running and driving any process to create
or modify a formal RFC Editor charter, at least as long as we have
the current organisational structure.  That process should be
as open as possible and should include specific outreach to members
of the Internet R&E community, not primarily focused on IETF folks.

Yours,

Ran
rja at extremenetworks.com



_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.