Re: STRAW PROPOSAL RFC Editor charter

To: Scott Bradner <sob at harvard.edu>
Subject: Re: STRAW PROPOSAL RFC Editor charter
From: Patrik Fältström <paf at cisco.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2006 21:48:21 -0800
Authentication-results: imail.cisco.com; header.From=paf@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( message from cisco.com verified; );
Cc: leslie at thinkingcat.com, rja at extremenetworks.com, iab at ietf.org, ietf at ietf.org
Dkim-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; l=378; t=1142660981; x=1143093181; c=relaxed/simple; s=nebraska; h=Subject:From:Date:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Mime-Version; d=cisco.com; i=paf@cisco.com; z=From:=3D?ISO-8859-1?Q?Patrik_F=3DE4ltstr=3DF6m?=3D=20<paf@cisco.com> |Subject:Re=3A=20STRAW=20PROPOSAL=20RFC=20Editor=20charter |To:Scott=20Bradner=20<sob@harvard.edu>; X=v=3Dmtcc.com=3B=20h=3DB4eISHrWFQByoeJaCRZItW/sm6w=3D; b=NDywvYAvHd5j3HAFYejgzMfWnqMgnC95M/2/oHG27O69wkR91tTzGoGIQ9ZeM4AzufSBzaTO dRKK/BVuCR4OR79fDIRyH7/5u7VktB82H9NAdc9BD8s9L/dCgDukYvi++AN8T8t5iU0eBik27mq KT+aBhn6UxsLoCxenlPYuDmo=;
In-reply-to: <20060318035638.361836BF449@newdev.harvard.edu>
List-help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <20060318035638.361836BF449@newdev.harvard.edu>


On 17 mar 2006, at 19.56, Scott Bradner wrote:

I think they are independent submissions (not generally written by
teh RFC Editor staff)

I agree, I also think they are individual submissions...but today RFC Editor select/approve which ones of the submitted ones are "good enough" to become april 1 RFC's...and I think that was your point Scott?

   Patrik

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

Follow-Ups:
- Re: STRAW PROPOSAL RFC Editor charter
  - From: Scott Bradner

References:
- Re: STRAW PROPOSAL RFC Editor charter
  - From: Scott Bradner

Prev by Date: Re: STRAW PROPOSAL RFC Editor charter
Next by Date: IETF 65 Streaming effort revisited.
Previous by thread: Re: STRAW PROPOSAL RFC Editor charter
Next by thread: Re: STRAW PROPOSAL RFC Editor charter
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: STRAW PROPOSAL RFC Editor charter

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.