Re: STRAW PROPOSAL RFC Editor charter

To: paf at cisco.com, sob at harvard.edu
Subject: Re: STRAW PROPOSAL RFC Editor charter
From: sob at harvard.edu (Scott Bradner)
Date: Sat, 18 Mar 2006 07:43:14 -0500 (EST)
Cc: leslie at thinkingcat.com, rja at extremenetworks.com, iab at ietf.org, ietf at ietf.org
In-reply-to: <B289B63C-AA5A-41D0-AB8B-47EFBE9D31A3@cisco.com>
List-help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>

> I think that was your point Scott?


I just wanted to be sure the list of RFC types was complete

Scott

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

References:
- Re: STRAW PROPOSAL RFC Editor charter
  - From: Patrik Fältström

Prev by Date: Re: RFC Publication - Patent-Free Declarations ... -- Market of Protocols -- Free Protocols Foundation
Next by Date: Re: RFC Editor and 2006 timeline
Previous by thread: Re: STRAW PROPOSAL RFC Editor charter
Next by thread: Re: STRAW PROPOSAL RFC Editor charter
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: STRAW PROPOSAL RFC Editor charter

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.