Re: Suggestion on a BCP specific WG...

[Joe Touch <touch at ISI.EDU>]

todd glassey wrote:
> Response-
> 
> No Joel - you are dead wrong IMHO. The IETF doesnt get to redefine the
> Industry Term BCP to mean 'some document we publish'.

We use the term "Request for Comments" when after last call for input.

We use the term "Standard" when we have no official compliance process.

We are not industry, we are the IETF ;-)

What we mean when we use the term BCP - and have for a number of years -
is our decision, as with Standard or anything else.

Joe

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf