Re: Guidance needed on well known ports

To: Eliot Lear <lear at cisco.com>
Subject: Re: Guidance needed on well known ports
From: Brian E Carpenter <brc at zurich.ibm.com>
Date: Sun, 19 Mar 2006 23:23:45 +0100
Cc: IANA <iana at iana.org>, netconf <netconf at ops.ietf.org>, IETF Discussion <ietf at ietf.org>, Lisa Dusseault <lisa at osafoundation.org>
In-reply-to: <441C457D.5080900@cisco.com>
List-help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Organization: IBM
References: <441C457D.5080900@cisco.com>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113

Regardless of what the community consensus is on:

1. Are well known ports archaic?


I want to comment that on this:

 If so, can we request that the IANA
      do away with the distinction?


The IETF decides, and the IANA will then be responsible for implementing the decision.

   Brian


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

References:
- Guidance needed on well known ports
  - From: Eliot Lear

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.