![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Ran,
I could argue with quite a lot of what you say, but I won't. Cutting to the chase:
RJ Atkinson wrote: ...
The IAB (or possibly ISoc BoT, but more obviously IAB and not the IESG) ought to be running and driving any process to create or modify a formal RFC Editor charter, at least as long as we have the current organisational structure.
The IAB is doing so. This thread was started by the IAB Chair and I'm an IAB member.
as open as possible and should include specific outreach to members of the Internet R&E community, not primarily focused on IETF folks.
I think it *should* be primarily focussed on the IETF and IRTF communities. Those are, objectively, the people who generate the overwhelming majority of RFCs.
Brian
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf at ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.