RE: Re: [TLS] Re: Last Call: 'TLS User Mapping Extension' to Proposed Standard

[Russ Housley <housley at vigilsec.com>]

I need to add a point of information regarding "assisted" in the text 
below.  I insisted that the solution support multiple name forms and 
that the solution include a backward compatible mechanism as new name 
forms are registered.  I did offer some guidance during AD Review to 
ensure that these properties were included.

Russ


At 01:35 PM 3/20/2006, Stefan Santesson wrote:
> <Stefan> We can't define a new user mapping type just to have one more.
> There has to be a use case with a need for one. The current hint can be
> used with a wide set of account names in practically any environment
> that use the principles of user at domain.
>
> But the extensibility is there in case a new need is there in the
> future.
> The security AD (Russ) has assisted in developing that part of the
> document.


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf