Re: Appeal of AD Decision to uphold Atompub ban
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Appeal of AD Decision to uphold Atompub ban



Robert,

Robert Sayre wrote:
On 3/19/06, Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf at mit.edu> wrote:

Remember suspensions are a tool to improve efficiency of
working groups, not punishments to punish people for bad behavior.


Sam, thank you for your calm remarks. After spending a week thinking
about this suspension, I have decided to withdraw my appeal, even
though I still believe it was an unjust decision. The appeal is too
distracting for the Atompub WG, who are supposed to be getting work
done right now. I am skeptical that Atompub will get any work done,
since I believe they have inaccurately identified the cause of their
problems, but I wish them luck with the text I wrote for them.

IESG members, please consider the appeal withdrawn.

Noted, and thank you.

Thank you, and I apologize for the waste of time.

We have an appeals process for good reasons, and you should certainly not apologize for starting to use it.

Brian

Robert Sayre




_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf




Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.