Re: Moving from "hosts" to "sponsors"
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Moving from "hosts" to "sponsors"



I think that the IETF neglects (or, rather, has neglected in the past) many possible
opportunities for sponsorship. That implies that increasing the income
from sponsorship should be possible.


People who are concerned with this issue should talk (or email) our IAD, Ray Pelletier, who
has a number of ideas in this area (and who reads this list).
If people feel that some sorts of sponsorship are not
appropriate, I am sure that Ray would like that input too.


In the new IASA / NeuStar system, there is no choice but to be realistic with
cost figures. Note that the registration fee and the attendance both went
up with this meeting, which of course means that revenue increased. I actually think
that, with revenue and sponsorship both increasing, the IETF should be
able to improve the meeting support and experience even more in the future.


Regards
Marshall

On Mar 24, 2006, at 12:52 AM, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote:

I don't think the meeting fees could actually go down, may be more in the
other way around if we are realistic with the cost figures.


Actually the cost is already high for a sponsor, and I believe trying to get
more from the industry (or other kind of sponsors) for each meeting will be
really difficult.


Regards,
Jordi




De: Andy Bierman <ietf at andybierman.com>
Responder a: <ietf-bounces at ietf.org>
Fecha: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 19:34:00 -0800
Para: <dcrocker at bbiw.net>
CC: Keith Moore <moore at cs.utk.edu>, "ietf at ietf.org" <ietf at ietf.org>,
<jordi.palet at consulintel.es>, Michael StJohns <mstjohns at mindspring.com>
Asunto: Re: Moving from "hosts" to "sponsors"


Dave Crocker wrote:
Michael StJohns wrote:
What I think Jordi is saying is that he wants the US sponsors to
subsidize the cost of the overseas meetings. At least that's what it
works out to be....

This view can be mapped to a classic model that would have significant
benefits for the IETF:



A "host" gets all sorts of marketing leverage out of the role in producing an IETF.

There is nothing that requires that the event site management effort be
coupled with a particular host's venue.


If we moved to a model of having companies provide sponsorship funds, in
return for which they get appropriate marketing presence, then we could
have meeting venue management move to the sort of predictable and timely
basis -- ie, far enough ahead of time -- that has been a concern for
many years.


Amen!  And maybe the meeting fees could actually go down
with enough sponsors.  An additional room like the terminal
room (not out in the open) could be used.


Also, the IETF could maintain control of the network if there were multiple sponsors instead of a single host. They would not be allowed to ignore the advice of the NOC team, and let the wireless meltdown right off the bat.





d/



Andy


_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf at ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf




**********************************************
The IPv6 Portal: http://www.ipv6tf.org

Barcelona 2005 Global IPv6 Summit
Slides available at:
http://www.ipv6-es.com

This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the use of the individual(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, including attached files, is prohibited.




_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf at ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf




Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.