![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
> >> One option however would be to seek 'partnerships' between vendors and > >> the IETF that span more than one meeting. Unless that impacted the > >> perceived 'neutrality' of the IETF and its standardisation processes. > >> > > I suspect that this would indeed be a question. > > To invoke a particularly apt cliche punchline: we are merely haggling about price. ah yes, but perhaps the point of that joke is that there really is a difference between a novelty and a commodity. _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf at ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.